top of page
Check back soon
Once posts are published, you’ll see them here.

Movies: Prison in the Andes (2023) by Felipe Carmona: Pinochet's Torturers in a Luxury Cage

  • Writer: dailyentertainment95
    dailyentertainment95
  • Sep 28
  • 6 min read

A Concise Chilean Political Thriller

Prison in the Andes (Original title: Penal Cordillera) is a 2023 Chilean political drama and thriller directed and written by Felipe Carmona. The film has a runtime of 1 hour and 44 minutes (104 minutes) and focuses on a darkly absurd true story: five high-ranking officials from Augusto Pinochet's brutal dictatorship serving their sentences in a secluded, luxurious "prison" at the foot of the Andes Mountains. When one inmate's arrogant television interview sparks national outrage, the government begins to strip their privileges, leading the aging but still-powerful torturers to violently resist any attempt at transfer to a regular jail. Starring Andrew Bargsted, Hugo Medina, and Bastián Bodenhöfer, the film has received 4 wins and 10 nominations on the festival circuit, recognizing its potent blend of political drama and satire.

Why to Watch This Movie: A Dark, Fact-Based Exploration of History

Catchy Title: Unflinching Look at Unrepentant Evil and Privilege

  • Timely Political Relevance: The film delves into the lingering consequences of the Pinochet dictatorship, specifically exploring how the "old guard" still attempts to exert control and privilege decades after the regime's fall.

  • Tonal Ambiguity and Complexity: The movie is not a straightforward drama, but boldly blends political drama, satire, and thriller elements. This results in a complex, uneven, but ultimately engaging experience, with "suspenseful moments [that] are genuinely thrilling" and comedic scenes that offer an "unexpected, if not outright hilarious, charm."

  • Fact-Based and Absurd Premise: The central premise—five brutal torturers living in a luxury mountain retreat—is an almost unbelievable fact of Chilean history, providing a fertile ground for exploring themes of justice, impunity, and privilege.

  • Strong Ensemble Cast: Despite mixed reviews on character development, the "cast delivers memorable performances," particularly in embodying the arrogance and entitled nature of the former military officials.

  • Technical Excellence: The film is praised for its high technical quality, from production design (highlighting the absurdity of the luxury "prison") to its cinematography, which captures the bleakness of the surrounding Andean hills.

What is the Trend followed: Confronting National Historical Trauma

Catchy Title: Post-Dictatorship Reckoning in Latin American Cinema

The film follows the trend of Latin American Cinema Confronting its Violent Political History through critical and often satiric lenses.

  • Dictatorship and Aftermath: The film directly addresses the legacy of the Pinochet dictatorship (1973–1990) and the subsequent struggle for justice and accountability.

  • Global Festival Appeal: Films dealing with complex national historical trauma, especially when employing innovative genre blends, are consistently sought after by international film festivals, giving the film strong artistic visibility.

  • The Impunity Narrative: The specific focus on the privileged incarceration and lack of repentance highlights the ongoing global narrative of impunity for high-ranking political criminals.

Director's Vision: Blending Satire, Thriller, and Political Critique

  • Genre-Bending Approach: Director-Writer Felipe Carmona intentionally wavers in genre, attempting to utilize elements of political drama, thriller, and satire to tell the story of Chile's lingering historical struggle.

  • Focus on Control: The vision centers on the old guard's residual power, showing how the aged inmates still "call the shots" and treat the young guards "more like servants than corrections officers," highlighting a societal power structure that has yet to fully shift.

  • Visually Evocative Setting: The choice of the luxurious compound nestled in the Andes is deliberate, with the beautiful but "bleakness of the surrounding hills" reflecting the internal and national political darkness.

Themes: Justice, Impunity, and Generational Conflict

  • Impunity and Privilege: The most prominent theme is the absurdity of justice and the privilege of the elite. The inmates, despite being "brutal torturers," live in comfort, highlighting a stark contrast with the suffering they inflicted.

  • Struggle with Violent History: The narrative explores South America's struggle with its violent past, particularly the control the "old guard" still exerts over the younger generation of guards and authorities.

  • Arrogance vs. Accountability: The plot is driven by the inmates' profound arrogance—their refusal to express remorse—which forces the government to finally act, creating the central conflict of the film.

  • The Erosion of Power: The film charts the gradual erosion of the inmates' privileges, detailing their ferocious, and ultimately futile, resistance to losing the last vestiges of their power.

Key Success Factors: Artistic Courage and Ensemble Acting

  • Bold Narrative Choice: The decision to focus on the luxury prison and the unrepentant nature of the torturers is a bold and controversial artistic choice that makes the film politically potent and memorable.

  • Technical Quality: The movie excels in technical aspects, from production design to the lighting and cinematography, which enhance the visual storytelling and atmospheric tension.

  • Cast Commitment: The ensemble cast, including actors who were real-life victims of the dictatorship, brought a necessary weight and commitment to the material, making the emotional stakes feel authentic.

  • International Recognition: The 4 wins and 10 nominations on the festival circuit demonstrate the film's success in resonating with international audiences and critics despite its local historical context.

Awards & Nominations: Critically Recognized Festival Success

The film has achieved considerable success on the film festival circuit, boasting a total of 4 wins and 10 nominations. This strong showing indicates high recognition for the film's complex narrative, directing, and acting from various international film bodies and critics.

Critics Reception: Engaging but Tonal Confusion

Captivating Content, Conflicting Styles

  • User Review (panta-4): This reviewer gave the film an 8/10, stating it "explores South America's struggle with its violent history." While acknowledging that the film "seems to waver in its genre," it "remains engaging," with the "suspenseful moments [being] genuinely thrilling."

  • User Review (brentsbulletinboard): This reviewer gave the film a 4/10, criticizing the film for being "All Over the Map" with "little coherency connecting the various segments." The reviewer found the "conflicting cinematic styles" (including a "silly" black-and-white silent movie sequence) to "seriously bog down the overall flow of the story."

  • IMDb Rating (5.3/10): The film's low rating from limited user votes suggests the tonal and narrative inconsistencies have divided the general audience.

Overall Critics Summary: The film is intensely divisive, with some critics praising its bold, scene-by-scene captivation and strong political themes, while others heavily criticize its "muddled" assembly, "tonal inconsistencies," and use of "conflicting cinematic styles" which left them "more confused than enlightened."

Reviews: User and Site-Specific Data Pending

  • User Reviews: The two detailed user reviews show a clear split in opinion, ranging from a "Highly recommended" 8/10 to an "All Over the Map" 4/10 score.

  • IMDb Aggregate: The current user rating of 5.3 on IMDb suggests a mixed-to-negative overall reception from the few dozen users who have rated it so far, indicating its niche and polarizing nature.

Overall User Summary: User reviews are highly polarized, reflecting the film's complex blending of tones and genres. While some found it a deeply engaging and recommended piece of political cinema, others found its narrative structure to be confusing and incoherent.

Movie Trend: Blended-Genre Political Thrillers

The film is following the trend of Blended-Genre Political Thrillers in world cinema. It refuses to adhere to a single genre, instead combining high-stakes political drama with dark satire and elements of a suspense thriller. This approach allows the film to tackle a serious historical subject with an accessible, and at times absurd, cinematic energy, making the difficult subject matter more digestible for a modern audience.

Social Trend: Memorialization and Justice for Historical Crimes

The film follows the global social trend of Memorialization and the Demand for Justice for Historical Crimes. By depicting unrepentant torturers who believe they are entitled to special treatment, the film serves as an artistic contribution to the ongoing public debate in Chile and across the world about the need for full accountability, remembrance, and the dismantling of old power structures that protect criminals from their past actions.

Final Verdict: A Rowdy, Must-Watch Piece of Self-Aware Fun

Catchy Title: A Challenging but Essential Look at Impunity

Prison in the Andes is a challenging, tonally complex, but ultimately essential piece of political cinema for those interested in Latin American history and historical justice. Its success lies in its bold exploration of impunity and the absurdity of privilege, highlighted by strong performances and excellent technical execution. While its experimental blend of satire and drama may be polarizing, its festival success and potent subject matter make it a highly recommended watch for audiences willing to grapple with an uneven but thought-provoking narrative.


Comments


Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2020 by DailyEntertainmentWorld. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page